HomeIQ Score › TEI

Public snapshot

TEI Income Quality Score

Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund (TEI) has an Income Quality Score of 55/100, classified as a Question Mark with high confidence, based on a 10-year income and total-return history.

Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund (TEI) is a closed-end fund and is part of the IQ Score universe.

July 2026 snapshotAs of June 30, 2026Lookback: 10-year
Long-term focused10-year income and total-return analysis
Data-drivenObjective scoring across 5 quality, distribution and risk signals
Clear classificationFriends to own. Foes to avoid.
IQ Score
55/100
Question MarkHigh confidence
Asset Type
CEF
Exchange
NYSE
Trailing Yield (TTM)
Not published
No normalized trailing yield is published for closed-end funds in this snapshot.
Rank in CEF Universe
153 of 358
Lookback
10-year
Data as of
June 30, 2026
How the IQ Score works →
About this snapshot
This is the public July 2026 snapshot. Public snapshots are delayed and frozen: once released, a month's scores do not change, and current data is reserved for members. The July 2026 snapshot is published as the public launch snapshot.
Read about data freshness →
Follow TEI and 700+ Other Income Tickers

Get a free monthly email as new public IQ Score snapshots are released — new Friends, downgrades and distribution changes across the income universe.

TEITempleton Emerging Markets Income Fund
55Question MarkHigh confidence
Snapshot
2026-06
Data as of
2026-06-30
Lookback
10-year
Asset type
Closed-End Fund

IQ Score History

6535FRIENDQUESTION MARKFOE0501002023-052026-022026-062023-05-31 · 19.9 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12023-07-31 · 21.2 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12023-09-29 · 19.7 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12023-11-30 · 13.9 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-01-31 · 15.4 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-03-28 · 17.4 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-05-31 · 28.9 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-07-31 · 30.0 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-09-30 · 31.4 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-11-29 · 29.7 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-01-31 · 26.7 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-03-31 · 23.9 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-05-30 · 25.3 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-07-31 · 26.9 · Foe · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-09-30 · 46.1 · Question Mark · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-11-28 · 47.0 · Question Mark · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12026-01-30 · 53.5 · Question Mark · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12026-03-31 · 51.6 · Question Mark · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12026-05-15 · 52.4 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-05-20 · 52.6 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-05-22 · 52.5 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-05-27 · 53.0 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-05-29 · 53.0 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-02 · 53.4 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-04 · 53.3 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-08 · 53.0 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-10 · 52.9 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-12 · 53.3 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-16 · 53.7 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-18 · 53.6 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-23 · 54.0 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-25 · 54.3 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-29 · 54.6 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-30 · 54.7 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v16535FRIENDQUESTION MARKFOE0501002023-052026-06

Reconstructed monthly scores are computed from current data and methodology. Published snapshots are the frozen monthly releases, marked on the line. Where the methodology changed, the line is broken rather than joined across the change.

Signals & Drivers

IQ signal scores

Each signal is normalised to 0–100 and combined by weight into the overall IQ Score.

Economic Payout Coverage
26/100
Working Capital Preservation
64/100
Distribution Cut Score
10/100
Distribution Trend
100/100
NAV CAGR
100/100

What is working

  • Working capital preserved over time
  • Distributions growing year-over-year
  • Stable NAV over available history

What to watch

  • Distributions exceed long-term total return
  • 3+ years with a material annual distribution decline

Flags & gates

  • Chronic Dist Cuts

Distribution Safety

14Years raised
5Years cut
33Years of data
RisingCurrent trend

High confidence (10-year history)

  1. 19940.31Held
  2. 19950.93Raised
  3. 19961.24Raised
  4. 19971.24Held
  5. 19981.24Held
  6. 19990.93Lower total
  7. 20001.29Raised
  8. 20011.3445Raised
  9. 20021.24Lower total
  10. 20031.31Raised
  11. 20041.0Lower total
  12. 20050.97Lower total
  13. 20061.0567Raised
  14. 20071.3395Raised
  15. 20081.4405Raised
  16. 20091.1248Lower total
  17. 20101.2424Raised
  18. 20111.4032Raised
  19. 20121.8681Raised
  20. 20131.4441Lower total
  21. 20141.1943Lower total
  22. 20150.8218Lower total
  23. 20160.8Lower total
  24. 20170.6208Cut
  25. 20180.8915Raised
  26. 20190.7821Cut
  27. 20200.5706Cut
  28. 20210.7614Raised
  29. 20220.6522Cut
  30. 20230.5655Cut
  31. 20240.57Held
  32. 20250.875Raised
  33. 20260.285Partial year

Distributions per year, from the frozen distribution-stability signal. “Lower total” means the calendar-year sum was smaller than the prior year (often a special-distribution rolloff or timing shift), but did not decline more than the engine's 10% material-decline threshold — see Years Cut above for years that did.

The IQ Score is a research classification of historical income quality. It is not investment advice, not a recommendation and not a prediction of future returns.

Explore More Income Quality Scores

Browse the full Income Quality Score research across CEFs, BDCs, REITs and income ETFs.