HomeIQ Score › MCI

Public snapshot

MCI Income Quality Score

Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) has an Income Quality Score of 61/100, classified as a Question Mark with high confidence, based on a 10-year income and total-return history.

Barings Corporate Investors (MCI) is a closed-end fund and is part of the IQ Score universe.

July 2026 snapshotAs of June 30, 2026Lookback: 10-year
Long-term focused10-year income and total-return analysis
Data-drivenObjective scoring across 5 quality, distribution and risk signals
Clear classificationFriends to own. Foes to avoid.
IQ Score
61/100
Question MarkHigh confidence
Asset Type
CEF
Exchange
NYSE
Trailing Yield (TTM)
Not published
No normalized trailing yield is published for closed-end funds in this snapshot.
Rank in CEF Universe
117 of 358
Lookback
10-year
Data as of
June 30, 2026
How the IQ Score works →
About this snapshot
This is the public July 2026 snapshot. Public snapshots are delayed and frozen: once released, a month's scores do not change, and current data is reserved for members. The July 2026 snapshot is published as the public launch snapshot.
Read about data freshness →
Follow MCI and 700+ Other Income Tickers

Get a free monthly email as new public IQ Score snapshots are released — new Friends, downgrades and distribution changes across the income universe.

MCIBarings Corporate Investors
61Question MarkHigh confidence
Snapshot
2026-06
Data as of
2026-06-30
Lookback
10-year
Asset type
Closed-End Fund

IQ Score History

6535FRIENDQUESTION MARKFOE0501002023-052026-022026-062023-05-31 · 54.2 · Question Mark · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12023-07-31 · 62.7 · Question Mark · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12023-09-29 · 61.1 · Question Mark · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12023-11-30 · 65.7 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-01-31 · 68.3 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-03-28 · 66.2 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-05-31 · 66.0 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-07-31 · 69.7 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-09-30 · 71.2 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12024-11-29 · 69.4 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-01-31 · 71.7 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-03-31 · 77.3 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-05-30 · 75.4 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-07-31 · 70.8 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-09-30 · 70.6 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12025-11-28 · 70.3 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12026-01-30 · 68.5 · Friend · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12026-03-31 · 60.3 · Question Mark · Historical Reconstruction · iq-4class-v12026-05-15 · 60.4 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-05-20 · 60.1 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-05-22 · 60.7 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-05-27 · 61.4 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-05-29 · 63.9 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-02 · 61.2 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-04 · 60.5 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-08 · 59.9 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-10 · 59.9 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-12 · 61.2 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-16 · 61.1 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-18 · 61.3 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-23 · 60.5 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-25 · 60.6 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-29 · 60.5 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v12026-06-30 · 60.4 · Question Mark · Published Snapshot History · iq-4class-v16535FRIENDQUESTION MARKFOE0501002023-052026-06

Reconstructed monthly scores are computed from current data and methodology. Published snapshots are the frozen monthly releases, marked on the line. Where the methodology changed, the line is broken rather than joined across the change.

Signals & Drivers

IQ signal scores

Each signal is normalised to 0–100 and combined by weight into the overall IQ Score.

Economic Payout Coverage
56/100
Working Capital Preservation
71/100
Distribution Cut Score
70/100
Distribution Trend
44/100
NAV CAGR
62/100

What is working

  • Working capital preserved over time

What to watch

  • 1–2 years with a material annual distribution decline

Distribution Safety

16Years raised
1Years cut
42Years of data
DownCurrent trend

High confidence (10-year history)

  1. 19852.98Held
  2. 19866.05Raised
  3. 19874.7875Lower total
  4. 19883.8Lower total
  5. 19893.3Lower total
  6. 19902.8Lower total
  7. 19912.8Held
  8. 19922.275Lower total
  9. 19932.8Raised
  10. 19942.975Raised
  11. 19953.72Raised
  12. 19963.795Raised
  13. 19973.0275Lower total
  14. 19982.11Lower total
  15. 19992.73Raised
  16. 20002.76Raised
  17. 20011.88Lower total
  18. 20021.44Lower total
  19. 20031.48Raised
  20. 20042.16Raised
  21. 20052.29Raised
  22. 20062.48Raised
  23. 20072.57Raised
  24. 20082.16Lower total
  25. 20092.16Held
  26. 20102.16Held
  27. 20111.35Lower total
  28. 20121.6Raised
  29. 20131.2Lower total
  30. 20141.2Held
  31. 20151.2Held
  32. 20161.2Held
  33. 20171.2Held
  34. 20181.2Held
  35. 20191.2Held
  36. 20200.96Cut
  37. 20210.96Held
  38. 20221.02Raised
  39. 20231.42Raised
  40. 20241.69Raised
  41. 20251.6Lower total
  42. 20260.4Partial year

Distributions per year, from the frozen distribution-stability signal. “Lower total” means the calendar-year sum was smaller than the prior year (often a special-distribution rolloff or timing shift), but did not decline more than the engine's 10% material-decline threshold — see Years Cut above for years that did.

The IQ Score is a research classification of historical income quality. It is not investment advice, not a recommendation and not a prediction of future returns.

Explore More Income Quality Scores

Browse the full Income Quality Score research across CEFs, BDCs, REITs and income ETFs.